Design of Highly Specific Structural Fragments for Filtering Compounds with Undesirable Activities

Main Article Content

P.I. Savosina
D.S. Druzhilovskiy
D.A. Filimonov
V.V. Poroikov

Abstract

The design of chemical compounds with desired properties is a key approach in medicinal chemistry for drug development. Modifying structural formulas it is possible to reduce undesirable biological activities exhibited by the substance under study. Various in silico methods are widely used to predict the types of activity in designed molecules, thereby reducing both the financial and time costs associated with experimental screening of potentially unsafe substances. However, the performance of many computer-based assessment algorithms depends on well-balanced training datasets containing a sufficient number of both positive and negative examples (information on the structural formulas of compounds that do and do not exhibit the desired type of activity). When standard predictive approaches are not applicable, an alternative strategy involves assessing the presence or absence of structural fragments associated with specific biological effects. To support this approach, we have developed a method that estimates the contribution of individual atoms to a given biological activity, taking into account their local structural environment. The applicability of this method to practical drug discovery tasks was demonstrated by analyzing molecular targets linked to a broad range of adverse drug reactions. Moreover, comparison of the constructed fragments with known structural motifs responsible for molecular target binding confirms the robustness of our method and highlights its potential for identifying functionally relevant structural regions in compounds that interact with molecular targets lacking resolved three-dimensional structures.

Article Details

How to Cite
Savosina, P., Druzhilovskiy, D., Filimonov, D., & Poroikov, V. (2025). Design of Highly Specific Structural Fragments for Filtering Compounds with Undesirable Activities. Biomedical Chemistry: Research and Methods, 8(4), e00303. https://doi.org/10.18097/BMCRM00303
Section
PROTOCOLS OF EXPERIMENTS, USEFUL MODELS, PROGRAMS AND SERVICES

References

  1. Pennington, L.D., Hesse, M.J., Koester, D.C., McAtee, R.C., Qunies, A.M., Hu, D.X. (2024) Property-Based Drug Design Merits a Nobel Prize. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 67(14), 11452–11458. DOI
  2. Jenkinson, S., Schmidt, F., Rosenbrier Ribeiro, L., Delaunois, A., Valentin, J.P. (2020) A practical guide to secondary pharmacology in drug discovery. Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods, 105, 106869. DOI
  3. Lynch, J.J. 3rd, Van Vleet, T.R., Mittelstadt, S.W., Blomme, E.A.G. (2017) Potential functional and pathological side effects related to off-target pharmacological activity. Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods, 87, 108–126. DOI
  4. Dey, S., Luo, H., Fokoue, A., Hu, J., Zhang, P. (2018) Predicting adverse drug reactions through interpretable deep learning framework. BMC Bioinformatics, 19(Suppl 21), 476. DOI
  5. Druzhilovskiy, D.S., Stolbov, L.A., Savosina, P.I., Pogodin, P.V., Filimonov, D.A., Veselovsky, A.V., Stefanisko, K., Tarasova, N.I., Nicklaus, M.C., Poroikov, V.V. (2020) Computational Approaches To Identify A Hidden Pharmacological Potential In Large Chemical Libraries. Supercomputing Frontiers and Innovations, 7(3), 57-76. DOI
  6. Savosina, P., Druzhilovskiy, D., Filimonov, D., Poroikov, V. (2024) WWAD: the most comprehensive small molecule World Wide Approved Drug database of therapeutics. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 15, 1473279. DOI
  7. Filimonov, D., Druzhilovskiy, D., Lagunin, A., Gloriozova, T., Rudik, A., Dmitriev, A., Pogodin, P., Poroikov, V. (2018) Computer-aided Prediction of Biological Activity Spectra for Chemical Compounds: Opportunities and Limitations. Biomedical Chemistry: Research and Methods, 1(1), e00004. DOI
  8. ChemAxon. Cross-product documentation. Document formats. Marvin Documents – MRV. Retrieved October 16, 2025, from: https://docs.chemaxon. com/display/docs/formats_marvin-documents-mrv.md
  9. PubChem database. Retrieved October 1, 2025, from: https://pubchem.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/
  10. PubChem database. Table of Contents. BioAssay Results. Retrieved October 1, 2025, from: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ classification/#hid=72&search=BioAssay+Results
  11. Smolinska, S., Antolín-Amérigo, D., Popescu, F.D. (2023) Bradykinin Metabolism and Drug-Induced Angioedema. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(14), 11649. DOI
  12. Weissman, S., Aziz, M., Perumpail, R.B., Mehta, T.I., Patel, R., Tabibian, J.H. (2020) Ever-increasing diversity of drug-induced pancreatitis. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 26(22), 2902–2915. DOI
  13. Macías Saint-Gerons, D., Bosco Cortez, F., Jiménez López, G., Castro, J.L., Tabarés-Seisdedos, R. (2019) Cataracts and statins. A disproportionality analysis using data from VigiBase. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology : RTP, 109, 104509. DOI
  14. Safitri, N., Alaina, M.F., Pitaloka, D.A.E., Abdulah, R. (2021) A Narrative Review of Statin-Induced Rhabdomyolysis: Molecular Mechanism, Risk Factors, and Management. Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety, 13, 211–219. DOI
  15. Zeng, W., Deng, H., Luo, Y., Zhong, S., Huang, M., Tomlinson, B. (2025) Advances in statin adverse reactions and the potential mechanisms: A systematic review. Journal of Advanced Research, 76, 781–797. DOI
  16. Guggina, L.M., Choi, A.W., Choi, J.N. (2017) EGFR Inhibitors and Cutaneous Complications: A Practical Approach to Management. Oncology and Therapy, 5, 135–148. DOI
  17. Izzedine, H., Perazella, M.A. (2017) Adverse kidney effects of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors. Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation : Official Publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association, 32(7), 1089–1097. DOI
  18. Kapur, S., Zipursky, R., Jones, C., Remington, G., Houle, S. (2000) Relationship between dopamine D(2) occupancy, clinical response, and side effects: a double-blind PET study of first-episode schizophrenia. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 157(4), 514–520. DOI
  19. Ehlert, F.J., Pak, K.J., Griffin, M.T. (2012) Muscarinic agonists and antagonists: effects on gastrointestinal function. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, 208, 343–374. DOI
  20. Lin, S., Kajimura, M., Takeuchi, K., Kodaira, M., Hanai, H., Kaneko, E. (1997) Expression of muscarinic receptor subtypes in rat gastric smooth muscle: effect of M3 selective antagonist on gastric motility and emptying. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 42(5), 907–914. DOI
  21. Cao, Y., Jiang, T., Girke T. (2008) A maximum common substructure-based algorithm for searching and predicting drug-like compounds. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 24(13), i366–i374. DOI
  22. Scott, C., Dodson, A., Saulnier, M., Snyder, K., Racz, R. (2022) Analysis of secondary pharmacology assays received by the US Food and Drug Administration. Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods, 117, 107205. DOI
  23. Huggins, D.J., Venkitaraman, A.R., Spring, D.R. (2011) Rational methods for the selection of diverse screening compounds. ACS Chemical Biology, 6(3), 208–217. DOI
  24. Zheng, W., Tian, E., Liu, Z., Zhou, C., Yang, P., Tian, K., Liao, W., Li, J., Ren, C. (2022) Small molecule angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors: A medicinal chemistry perspective. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 13, 968104. DOI
  25. Patel, K.B., Heppner, D.E. (2025) Lazertinib: breaking the mold of thirdgeneration EGFR inhibitors. RSC Medicinal Chemistry, 16(3), 1049–1066. DOI
  26. Sutanto, F., Konstantinidou, M., Dömling, A. (2020) Covalent inhibitors: a rational approach to drug discovery. RSC Medicinal Chemistry, 11(8), 876–884. DOI
  27. Damghani, T., Chitnis, S.P., Abidakun, O.A., Patel, K.B., Lin, K.S., Ouellette, E.A., Lantry, A.M., Heppner, D.E. (2025) Profiling and Optimizing Targeted Covalent Inhibitors through EGFR-Guided Studies. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 68(16), 17917–17932. DOI
  28. Lin, J., He, Y., Ru, C., Long, W., Li, M., Wen, Z. (2024) Advancing Adverse Drug Reaction Prediction with Deep Chemical Language Model for Drug Safety Evaluation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(8), 4516. DOI